WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in order to form a perfect union, establish justice; ensure domestic tranquility; provide for the common defense; promote the general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity do ordain and establish this Constitution of the United States of America.
That's the preamble to the U.S. Constitution. I just typed it from memory.
I learned it from Television.
I learned it from the same place that taught me that 3 was a magic number, and that conjunctions joined up words and picked up clauses.
Schoolhouse Rock.
I learned an awful lot of other things from TV, too, when I was a kid and a teenager. Some good, some bad, some indifferent. The point was that TV was always there and it was always giving out information. Rare was the stuff I learned on TV -- is the stuff that I learn by watching the News. No. It was St. Elsewhere that first taught me that the Homeless were people other than bums. It was TV that taught me, when I lived in the South, as a matter of fact -- the long, tortured family story of Alex Haley and his ancestor Kunta Kinte, and sparked my exploration through books and other sources, America's tortured history of slavery. TV taught me about the Korean War through M*A*S*H, it taught me about class through All in the Family and The Jeffersons and Upstairs, Downstairs, and it even inspired my future career choices through the views of Minneapolis Newsroom WJM, and a radio station called WKRP.
Rick Mercer had a rant on his show this week that was angrier than usual, but also pretty trenchant:
What does that have to do with what I wrote above?
Everything.
Like it or not, TV is the major window on the world for millions of people. That is just the way it is. And of those millions, most won't pick up a newspaper or watch a nightly newscast. What they will see is stories. Those stories on TV in whatever form help shape what people think about.
So while there may be a lot of bleating from Alberta or from Little Green Footballs, Red Meat Eating Paleocons screaming about Liberal bias on the CBC news, the fact is that far more people are learning about the law, medicine, social policy, and yeah, politics -- from TV dramas and comedies than they ever learn from a "news" source. I don't say that's the way that it should be. I say that's the way it is.
No wonder Canadians were confused. Most of them haven't heard a peep about the Canadian Parliamentary system since they struggled through their last high school history class.
Meanwhile, in the U.S., a show about the inner workings of the U.S. Government ran seven seasons. In the UK, they've had two or three shows about how their Parliament works -- most of them comedies.
You sell your airwaves completely to U.S. programming, and it comes with a cost. And though Canwest and CTV might bitch about how that cost affects their bottom line, the truth is the cost to our bottom line as Canadian citizens is far greater. We've been on the spike to another countries' values for a long time now. Those values are similar more often than not. But similar is not the same.
The people who hold the airwaves in trust for you, and the people who oversee them, for you, have gamed Canadian viewpoints out of that arena for a long time.
That comes with a cost. There's just no way around that. Having a climate where even when you do get something on the air, you can't really make it too local because you can't screw up that U.S. sale with talk of proroguing or Parliament or anything that might seem....not American, well....that's the greater sin, isn't it? What a small price to pay -- all we have to do is deny the entire populace any chance to learn anything by osmosis that isn't about Hockey or Tim Horton's.
I'm as angry as Rick, and I was as disgusted as he was when I saw all that crap go down before Christmas. In fact, I heard so much stupid, misinformed stuff coming out of people's mouths, people with no idea how their government worked, that it made me want to punch somebody. For which I probably would have gotten arrested. But at least if that happened, I would hope I was lucky enough not to try and take the fifth on the stand, because of course, I know that under the Canadian system of law there is no inherent right you can invoke against self-incrimination.
Think most Canadians would know that? I'm not so sure. There sure are a lot of Law & Order repeats on the air.
David Milgaard was a miscarriage of justice. How many people know that from the news, and how many from the TV Movie? How many people learned about Tommy Douglas from The Greatest Canadian, or Prairie Giant?
You give away your culture, you give away your soul. And then, really, what does it matter that you don't know how the nuts and bolts of government work?
Pssssst. It's all. the. same. thing.
17 comments:
Hey! Great post. Will have to show it to my business students who sometimes ask why we need to promote Canadian culture. I e-mailed Konrad von Finkenstein about your recent post about Arpin. He promptly forwarded my e-mail to Arpin and cc'ed me. Here is his e-mail, and we'll see what Arpin says.
Cheers,
Maxim
__________________________________
Michel
I would suggest you write to Mr. Voronov directly and explain your interview
Konrad
-----Original Message-----
From: Maxim Voronov [mailto:MVoronov@brocku.ca]
Sent: January 14, 2009 1:32 PM
To: von Finckenstein, Konrad
Subject: Michel Arpin
Dear Mr. von Finckenstein:
I am writing to urge you to insist that Mr. Arpin recuse himself from any deliberations that involve the future and well-being of Canadian television and culture. Given his admission that he is not interested in the well-being of Canadian television, I believe it is essential that he not be allowed to influence policies that are likely to impact the industry for years to come. I am not involved with the industry in any way, but I am, like most Canadians, a TV watcher, and therefore, I believe that decisions that impact the industry should be made by individuals who care about these industries.
Thank you for your attention.
Respectfully,
Maxim Voronov, Ph.D.
Fantastic, Maxim. Good for you!
85% of what little I know about Canadian civics comes from Snakes & Ladders. Trufax.
Most of the rest comes from the college friend who tipped me about said show, who's a fairly high-profile political blogger. Perhaps not coincidentally, she's also an American-born transplant.
Maybe it's just because I'm a weird fangirl with weird fangirl friends, but sometimes it seems like there are more Americans interested in Canadian culture than Canadians.
Shhh. We don't talk about that part.
I remember my first TV boss back when I was booking panels for chat shows.
He'd furrow his brow and say, "we need an American on this panel."
And when people would ask why he'd say,
"because we have to have SOMEBDOY who's willing to get into an argument if that's what's needed -- not avoid it at ANY COST."
Super post
Moving here from The UK I was pretty shocked at the number of people in Canada that seemed to think that parliament worked more like the US system than the UK.
I'd love to see a show, drama or comedy, that is set in Canadian politics. Civil Service is just great fodder.
Maxim: great work, can't wait to see the follow up.
Denis you can buy all those old Scyhoolhouse Rock on DVD. I swear to God when I watched them it was like the last scene of Cinema Paradiso.
Oh, and (a conjunction. what's its function?) great post btw.
"In fact, I heard so much stupid, misinformed stuff coming out of people's mouths, people with no idea how their government worked, that it made me want to punch somebody."
Yes, it certainly is terrible when popular perception of what constitutes legitimate, democratic governance doesn't line up exactly with the technicalities of the law.
Well, terrible for the Coalition, anyway.
Not terrible for the country.
But I can see how you might get confused by the distinction.
No, troll, sorry.
Just like the reason why you take a "201" course after taking the prerequisite "101" course, so too the price of admission to an actual philosophical argument on the merits or pitfalls of a coalition is an agreement upon the basic rules of parliamentary democracy.
Anyone who sputtered about how it was "illegal" gets to go back and do remedial work.
Now go play with your dittohead friends. I'm picking out something pretty to wear to the Obama Party.
Wow what a great post. Totally made my day
Where's "Quentin Durgens" when you need him?
Yeah...pretty sweet. Made my day too, butcept I now feel an overwhelming urge to start rewatching 'West Wing'...
Just looked up Quentin Durgens -very cool.
Any idea where I could get the episodes?
Tried archives.cbc.ca but there's nothing.
Maybe I'll try library and archives here in Ottawa.
I'm a big fan of Scholastic Rock as well. The "I'm Just a Bill" episode remains my fav.
Hey Denis, here's a challenge for you! Write some Canadian civics (and history) shorts that the CBC (and Treehouse) can show during their kid programming blocks.
Yeah DMc, whip up some of those!
There's the PM who was a drunk. The one who slept with his dog and had psychics contact his mom for advice.
How about the ones who took envelopes of cash in hotels or handed 'em out in restaurants?
By the age of five the "Treehouse" gang should be ready to move to LA.
Denis and all, below is Michel Arpin's response to me. Best, Maxim
____________________________________
Dear Mr. Voronov,
Thank you for sharing your concerns in your e-mail dated January 15. Rest assured that I share your passion for Canadian television programming – in all its varieties – and Canadian culture.
As you may know, I have dedicated my entire career, now stretching over 40 years, to the Canadian broadcasting industry. In fact, you may be surprised to learn that early in my career I was a television producer.
It has been my privilege to serve as the CRTC’s Vice-Chairman of Broadcasting since September 2005, and in the last three and a half years, I have participated in numerous hearings and decisions that hopefully have benefited the Canadian television industry as a whole.
Those who are appointed to the CRTC have the obligation to remain independent and to share their expertise with their fellow Commissioners and Commission staff. Our decisions are guided by the principles and objectives of the Broadcasting Act, and are made on the basis of the facts and the public record before us, regardless of our personal preferences.
As mentioned in the Playback interview, my primary mandate as a regulator is to “create a framework for [creative people] to allow the broadcast media to expand and provide better service to Canadians.” The more successful we are in creating this framework, the more Canadian television creators will have opportunities to tell their stories.
As far as the Playback quote is concerned, you must appreciate that the interviewer asked me to name my favourite show; I felt it was inappropriate given my position. However, rest assured that, throughout the year, I watch all types of television news, documentaries as well as drama or feature films.
Sincerely,
Michel Arpin
Vice-président, Radiodiffusion / Vice Chair, Broadcasting
CRTC
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2
Téléphone / telephone (819) 994-0870
Butcept. Really. REALLY.
I guess we should rest assured then. Thanks Maxim...for clearing that up.
Bravo and kudos! Great rant on your part. You have said what I have felt and been saying all along. A country that doesn't have "TV sovereignty" is not a real country, but a piece of fiction.
Other countries require 60% domestic content on TV, including during primetime, and what do we do? We allow our commercial broadcasters, er, playback machines, to spend tons of money on U.S. imports and leaving next to nothing for CanCon (or local news).
And after they have burned all their money on U.S. schlock, they have the gall to step before the CRTC and demand to be paid by cable companies (read: you and me, the cable subscribers)!
Post a Comment