24's politics have never really bothered me before. I know people have pointed to various parts of the show (especially the whole subplot with the
"Amnesty Global" lawyer last season) and said it runs with a hard right Republican agenda. It certainly doesn't endear the show to me to know that it's one of the favorites of the
Rummy and
Cheney crowd. But there's always been just enough feints and jabs in my political direction to keep me faithful.
So why did I feel so wrong watching the end of last night's four hour first block? Sure, there were things in there that made me sad. And as a writer, I was pretty shocked too. I mean, if you're going to blow the Nuke in Downtown L.A. in episode
FOUR, you're burning through some very serious story, my friend. Those seasons are never 24's best. It's starting to look like Day 6 may be more like Day 4. Remember that one? Can you remember anything about the plot of that one? There were like, nine plots in that overcooked day.
It's not like the viewpoints that I bring to bear on current world events weren't given airing. The President, the President's sister -- everybody seems to be saying the right things. Even the idea of working with an ex-terrorist who wants to go straight is a provocative idea. (I'm waiting for the discussion of blowback, although I guess
Curtis fit that bill, too.)
I guess what bothers me, though, is that the
United States portrayed in this season of 24 is the United States that Bush & Co have been trying to build in the public's mind for six years: the terrorists are wily and they're here and they can attack anytime. We have an incredibly well organized (as they always are) terrorist group, plotting and succeeding with multiple missions over an 11 week period. They're cool, they don't make mistakes, and they've got the United States on its knees. And you definitely get the sense that the three-months inaugurated
President Wayne Palmer maybe isn't up to the task of doing what needs to be done to stop them. Because he's not resolute, see. He's not the Decider.
The 9/11 attacks were horrible. But the
fact is, there hasn't been a bunch of attacks on U.S. soil since. And the 9/11 attacks didn't hit any of the places from where Bush draws (or drew) his strength. And yet still -- all of those things they talk about on 24. How people are scared and are turning on each other, how they're ready to shred the Constitution? Well, most of that has actually already happened, with nary a peep from the populace or the nation's media -- at least until recently.
In the world of 24, if not our world, the doctrine Bush & Co are pursuing seems measured and logical. A country on its knees maybe can't afford to think about the niceties. But America - the real America - is not that country. Except, in the real America, you have people talking about
'the terr'rists' in
Montana and
Birmingham and
Odessa,
Texas -- where they're likely never going to show their faces.
When the fooferal over
The Path to 9/11 happened, one of the most disingenuous things
ABC and the program makers' did was to say that it was based on the 9/11 Report, even though it contradicted a whole bunch of stuff in that report, then turn around and say, basically
"it's only tv."The whole point of TV images is that they have great impact. Greater impact, in fact, than articles or cool news reports about this or that. Everyone knows this. So when the Producers of 24 show a U.S. under siege, basically the worst Bush nightmare that's been sold and sold and sold -- and whose power was starting to wear off, finally, after they went to the well so many times. Well...I think that maybe the escapism that 24 offers just isn't fun anymore. I think it's a bit of a cheat, and maybe, just maybe, the agenda isn't entirely 100% gripping TV. In the world of 24, unlike our world, we've already been shown that torture works.
The thing that really worries me is this: could dear, doomed, tragic
Jack Bauer actually be working for the wrong side?