WHY CAN'T I free your doubtful mind and melt your cold, cold heart?
Hank Williams knew what he was talking about. But of course, sometimes the coldness isn't a lack of romantic ardour. Sometimes it's a deadness caused by too little exercising of the muscle. We all verge toward our comfort zones. It's human nature. But it's also the nature that can seriously muck up a writer. And that cold, cold heart gets colder sometimes, simply by virtue of where you're sitting.
One of the things that I truly feel is the responsibility of any writer is to get the heck out of their comfort zone and go do something. You don't have to die scaling K2, but for pity's sake, get out of your garret and go talk to some different faces now and again.
I live in a place that makes that inordinately difficult. Toronto is a famously cold city, and I'm not talking temperature. Toronto is one of the only places I've ever been where you can go out with a group of four reasonably gregarious people and find that at the end of the night, you've only talked to those people. Attempts to rectify this are rebuffed. There's a standoffishness that prevails, a pass down from the city's disapproving Orange roots. It says, "keep to yourself, don't challenge, don't engage, let everyone be." That's a way to get along, to be sure. But it's no way to create, or to set yourself an atmosphere in which to create.
The worst thing about this, though, is that daily routine conspires to make this seem normal. You forget that other places, other cities aren't like this. The coldness gets inside. After a while you forget that once upon in a time your doubtful mind wanted to melt something. What was that again? Hmm?
Though Toronto's my city (for now) and I've lived here many years, it's one of this burg's least attractive qualities.
Of course, the only problem with that analogy is that the city that could engage in a little foot-stomping glee over that, Vancouver, is actually a thousand times worse.
Please don't write me paeans to either city pointing out how wrong I am, how I've only been talking to the wrong people, etc, etc, I realize that I'm making a massive generalization here. And it doesn't mean that either city isn't lovely. They are. But my generalization here is borne out with much experience of both cities, and a lot of discussion of same with former and current residents.
The thing is, where you're from and what you experience has a lot of influence over your 'take.' And when you're a writer, your take is the most valuable thing you have. If you're from a place where new ideas are suspect and everyone acts or demands to be regarded in some orthodox way, that shrinks your take. It's why most artistic people find the need to leave their small towns and travel to somewhere where they feel they can fully express themselves.
But you can fool yourself by going to the big city, too -- if the city doesn't have a warm spirit, an openness, an energy that encourages mixing rather than many solitudes, you miss it. It dulls your take. And it causes you to think provincially.
Montreal has a lot going for it in this regard. People do talk. You can't walk anywhere in the summer without hitting some sort of street festival. But there's that language barrier that makes it not quite perfect. Spending time in Montreal always makes me curse the fact that my French isn't better. I feel like I'm missing the most interesting conversations.
Because, um...I probably am.
When Canadians venture to New York or London and get drunk on the feeling and excitement there, I think that's what they're feeling -- not the city's size. Toronto has a few festivals each year -- Pride, Caribana, Doors Open and Nuit Blanche, where part of the visceral excitement seems to be that the invisible barriers between people come down, and you can smile at a stranger or engage them in conversation without getting an alarmed "You're clearly a serial killer and I'm reaching for my whistle" expression in return.
I just got back from another city like that. For the last few days I've had laughs with strangers, explored a vision of optimism and wonder and seen stuff that made me vibrate with the joy of being alive, and the joy of living in a beautiful teeming city. I'm hoping to carry that forward with me for a few days, to not succumb to the Toronto shrink as quickly as I can. We'll see how it goes.
Lest you think I'm just engaging in a bit o' Canada bashing here (because Lord knows, that defensive muscle doesn't need a lot of pressure to be exercised) one of the most provincial places I think I've ever been is Los Angeles... L.A. is a town where the solitudes don't mix, ever. As an industry town, you may find yourself cheek to jowl with exactly the calibre of people you want to be in business with, but all they want to do is talk about the business. And I think you see that in the creative that comes out, certainly over the last little while. There's a great number of people who once upon a time might have had a truly different, truly original take who've been seduced by the easy living or the comforts of the like-minded. L.A. is a bubble, and a bubble is never a place that lets you hone your take.
Changing location is one way to burst that bubble, but it isn't the only way.
A few weeks ago I was at a local watering hole with a group of writers, and one particularly, perennially dyspeptic friend of mine demanded that we not talk shop, for once. And we didn't.
And the conversation that ensued was glorious and different and odd and touching... surprise, surprise ... get together with a group of smart articulate people and if you mine it a bit, turns out they have all sorts of things to say that could really rock your world.
I've had girlfriends and other civilians suffer through tablefuls of writer shop talk with rolled eyes and pinched faces -- blowing past this very simple truth. And yeah, I know, everyone talks shop. But office workers who get together and never seem to get much past the topic of how much of a dick the boss is aren't in the business of trying to create worlds and characters, and interesting daily situation. And that's why, for writers there's an extra burden of not falling back into that comfortable, shopworn view of the world. You must remember an essential truth:
Sometimes changing the mind's landscape is all it takes to refresh your take.
But every once in a wild, when you've built up too much crap, the sharp corrective of the landscape change does the job nicely. Kind of like changing the oil. Or descaling. Or... well, you get the idea. All I'm saying here is that if you're a Toronto guy or an L.A. girl or a Vancouver...TG...sorry, I went there... you have to remember that -- like people who live near the highway or down the street from the nuke plant -- you're at a heightened risk of dulling your take.
If you're a writer and you haven't been challenging your bubble lately -- if you've grown comfortable in your routine and don't engineer some kind of upending now and then, it's time to book a flight or drive your car or hitch to somewhere different. See who you are there.
Remember that every story we craft is all about a protagonist who suddenly has their world upset in some way. How can we do that if we blithely cruise along in our own little bubbles of smug self-satisfaction, or rectitude, or religious ecstacy, or liberal pride, or smug marriedom, gay camp, punk nihilism or hipster chic?
Refresh your take.
And if you do, I highly recommend taking in a Cubs game.
10 comments:
Thanks for reminding me I'm not in Manhattan - or Paris.
I went camping this summer and, outside of the bug bites, sunburn and allergies it was one of the best times I've had in a long time.
Sitting around a campfire with a bunch of shit-faced Canadians is truly a panacea for the soul.
Thanks. One more good reason to have taken those trips to Nanaimo and Chemainus, Charlottetown and Summerside, this summer.
Damn good reason.
And if you do, I highly recommend taking in a Cubs game.
Well, I'll grant you that trying to take the Red Line anywhere on the North Side on a game day will get you in close proximity with plenty of humanity... ;-D
At the risk of sounding like I'm trying to "correct" your observation (which I'm not), it's a surprising one to see about a city that has consistently given me a less dismissive reception than most in response to the big blinky invisible TOURIST sign over my head. Directions and small talk with visitors = easy, real conversation with fellow locals = not so much? Interesting puzzle.
This is a different way of saying partly the same thing, but I find that anyone who attempts generalizations about a place is saying more about themselves than the place. Any experience we have is inextricably linked with how we react to our environment, physical or mental. Changing our own attitude can open up new worlds far more than changing our location. Changing the physical landscape is the easiest way to shake up the mind’s landscape, but it’s not always the best way, because wherever we go, there we are.
I've sat with people who spend an evening bashing the city they're in and are astonished at the hostility with which people react to them, and blame it on the city instead of engaging in any self-reflection. I’ve travelled with the Accidental Tourist who is determined not to enjoy anything and then is seemingly shocked that they had a miserable time. I’ve lived with people who made no effort to meet others in their new city and yet complained they had no social life because the city was so unfriendly.
I’ve loved my time in LA and my experiences there seem to be polar opposite to yours, probably because I’m not in the business so I’m not in the bubble, allowing me to have normal conversations with people in and out of the industry. In Spain I encountered the rudest, least accommodating people I’ve ever met, and yet my best memories involve friendly, funny locals we encountered beyond the waiters who I’m sure spat in my food just for fun. But if we hadn’t made the effort to get out of the tourist bubble, all we would have met were the surly service industry people. I find Vancouver cliquey but so does every other non-native-Vancouverite, and there’s a lot of ways for us to meet each other – and the odd born-and-bred Vancouverite - if you choose to do it and don’t wander around snarling about how terrible the city is.
So, all that to say ... I'd delete the "sometimes" out of your "sometimes changing the mind's landscape is all it takes to refresh your take."
While I appreciate your suggestions re: editing, now and always, Diane, my take on this subject is that it's one of those happy, happy accidents where we can both claim victory and move on. Kind of like the War of 1812 -- the war that nobody lost.
You speak well and true of adjusting your mindscape, which is definitely what I was getting at in that portion of the entry.
Of course, like all blog entries -- yours included -- one brings one's own perspective into it, and proceeds from there. That's also how every fiction writer, prose or screen, approaches things. That's what your "take" is.
You and I have very different personal interactions with the world, based on our basic personalities and how we engage with others. Neither is wrong; they're just different. From that point of difference we both through experience have sought out the same thing -- an important thing that not everyone gets to experience -- which is an internal dialogue of "where do I want to be?" based on personal restlessness or experience. Many people don't really engage on this question. I always find it odd when I meet writers who don't, because to me it seems so fundamental to the mindset; the curiosity that feeds whatever comes next. Yet I can't deny the art that proceeds from people who've lived their whole lives in one place and never desired a change or something different. So what do I know?
Though I would even go so far as to agree with you, mostly, that changing the mindscape (the movement you need is on your shoulder, remember) is the most important part of things -- there is an essential nature of different cities and groupings that it's just silly to deny. And here's where you and I often part ways.
The Finns are notoriously melancholy, and have the suicide rate to prove it.
New Yorkers are brusque.
Austinites are weird. (There's a REASON why so many Austinites wear "Keep Austin Weird" t-shirts.)
What's curious about this is that most peoples accept this cheerfully. They recognize it and shrug a "what are you going to do" or an "it is what it is" and move on.
There's a fine tradition of self-mockery at the heart of the character of those from The Rock and the Maritimes, but it seems like in this great country the further west you go, the less affable people are about admitting their common personality pecadillos.
I just spent a few days hearing boasting followed by, "But that's just the way we are, we like to boast." Even Texans will smile at you when they say that they think they live in the greatest place on Earth.
But that kind of self awareness requires a perspective that seems to be lacking a bit here. Which is what the article was about.
I'm not surprised you disagree. I'm just invoking the kind shrug and the "it is what it is."
And the Americans won the War of 1812, by the way.
Thanks for your thoughtful and heartfelt comments -- they're always appreciated and welcome on this blog.
D
Let's not get into the War of 1812 - okay? As a dual, I'm schizo about it.
At the end of the war, the British held Michigan and parts of Ontario - which they had return to the US via the Treaty of Ghent. The british backed off of their assault on the eastern seaboard when the Duke of Wellington refused to take command of the North American forces citing that as the Americans controlled the Great Lakes - thanks to Oliver Hazard Perry - there was no possible way that the British could succeed and it was not worth a protracted war - considering they had just mopped up Napoleon. Liverpool took Wellington's advice and signed the Treaty of Ghent which restored the boundaries to what they had been before the war began.
And there was a loser to the war - the Natives. The British had promised Tecumseh and his pan-Indian confederacy their own territory (part of Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, part of Manitoba and Ontario) in the treaty.
They never got it.
No argument. Tecumseh's alliance got royally sold out, and they deserved much better.
Oh please, I wasn't suggesting you edit, I was suggesting if *I* were writing it, I'd have a slightly different opinion. That's what the phrase "I would" means, writer boy. If I thought you said something dumb I'd have said "If I were you I wouldn't ..."
I'm not denying the stereotypes ... I'm saying that we end up living only the stereotypes if we don't change our own mental landscape, which isn't escaping the bubble so much as bringing it with us. New Yorkers are absolutely brusque and I know people who hate the city because they never got past that veneer. I hated Lima because I couldn't get past the in your faceness of it ... but I know that I'd have a different perspective now that I have more travel experience. Toronto is arrogant but ... well, I'll leave it to people who have been there more to suggest what's below the surface.
I'm saying where ever you go, if you don't get past the stereotypes it's not because the place has one personality, it's because your personality has not allowed you to find anything below the surface. Of course I agree that changing location helps do that but I'm saying I agree more with the part where you need to prime your mind instead of just moving your body. Otherwise, to quote Pretty Woman, that's just geography.
There's also a huge difference between how a visitor engages with a city and how a local does.
Toronto ... great place to live, but I wouldn't want to visit there.
Post a Comment