Monday, May 5, 2008

R.I.P. Old Tv Habits

YESTERDAY'S NY TIMES had an interesting appreciation by Ginia Bellafante for the NBC show MEDIUM. In a piece called "Terrifying, Not Unlike Your Real Life," she makes a number of observations.

Created by Glen Gordon Caron (and existing at a significant tonal distance from “Moonlighting,” his other great contribution to television), “Medium” can be genuinely hard to endure, especially at home, alone, late at night (it is shown at 10 p.m. on Mondays), without wondering whether you should check behind the bedposts for sadists and other wack jobs.

Something terrible has always just happened, or is about to, and the viewer bears the apprehensive weight of Allison’s foreknowledge, having witnessed the violently detailed dreams that disrupt her sleep almost every other nocturnal hour. (No one has ever needed a regular prescription of Ambien more.) Sometimes Allison’s forecasts can keep a rape or a killing from occurring. Mostly, though, Allison receives random images in the night — a woman, for example, fighting with her husband in a hotel room in France — only to learn, usually the next day, that someone who looks like the person she dreamt about has disappeared, which propels her toward the evidence that allows the authorities to solve the case. The woman in France, Allison intuited, had been abducted by her embittered ex-husband and then psychologically tortured in a re-creation of the honeymoon suite in Paris that the couple had stayed in years before.

“Medium” borrows from the conventions of classic horror the idea that real nightmares result from arbitrary or misplaced trust. The camera lingers on the faces of victims in waiting as they put their faith in attackers whose malevolence they cannot yet see. An episode early this year revolved around the killing of a little boy, supplying the single most chilling moment on television in quite a long while: a smiling child watched as a man, shot from the waist down, slowly kicked off his shoes and danced to “Rapper’s Delight” in front of him. The little boy had followed his kidnapper out of a toy store, lured by a marionette slung over the man’s back and lost to his father’s distracting business call on his cellphone.

Medium is one of those shows I remember watching three or four episodes of a few years ago and then never troubling myself about again. Patricia Arquette, to me, seemed a soft heroine, and I could never quite get the image of Alabama from True Romance out of my head, which kind of made me want to go back and watch that film instead of Medium.

But one night a few months ago I found myself at my parents house and saw a few minutes of the show. I was interested to see that apparently, a character who had been a prosecutor was now a defence attorney. That kind of flip always interests me. Now with the Times article, there's also the notion that they're actually one of the few shows on American Television playing out the true economic anxieties of most Americans:

Work, on “Medium,” has been implicated as a distinctly dangerous pastime more than once. At the end of last season Allison’s husband, Joe (Jake Weber), an aerospace engineer, and his colleagues were held hostage at gunpoint by a fired employee who, dying of cancer, demanded millions of dollars in compensation for the loss of his health insurance and other benefits. “Medium” is so committed to the grim realities of middle-class life that it is a paranormal show that very often doesn’t feel like one. This season Joe has no job at all: it’s a tough economy, and he has found it impossible to find another. Allison’s credit cards are declined at a grocery store; her eldest daughter hasn’t gotten her allowance in weeks. Indian call centers operating on behalf of lenders phone the Dubois household constantly, and the bills keep falling, one on top of the other.
So, okay. Bottom line (and this is why articles like this set the NYTimes Arts coverage above most other papers) is that I guess I'm gonna go give Medium another chance.

Which brings up the issue of viewership patterns generally. Since the settlement of the WGA strike, and with the possibility of an Actors strike a real going concern, I know that some data has indicated that viewers have returned. But I haven't. Not really.

These days it seems that my only true "must-sees" are House, 30 Rock, The Office and Battlestar Galactica. I'd like to be watching LOST, but I fell behind and now find it difficult to catch up.

Instead, when I turn to my TV I find myself drawn in by different fare ranging far afield.

In Treament, which caused a brief stir when it premiered, among my peer group seems to be the first series that has arrived in the On-Demand era. I devoured that show in great swaths of five episodes...and judging by the level of conversation I'm hearing about it now, as opposed to weeks ago when it was on -- I think a lot of people are doing the same thing.

I've also kind of fallen in love with the British show Skins, which I'm finally getting a chance to see.

I'm not burning to see a new Knight Rider. And as I slowly start to get my hands on some of the pilot scripts of the upcoming season (if there's no Actor's strike, that is) I can't say I'm actually all that impressed.

So then, to you -- do you have a Medium in your bunch -- a show previously dismissed that you've given a second chance to? Discuss.

14 comments:

Brandon Laraby said...

I have a confession to make - I've only just recently started to watch Durham County.

*hangs head*

As I watch this show play out I can't help but wonder "This is Canadian?!"

My Gawd. It's wonderful.

Anonymous said...

You should definately watch Lost. Watch it this summer, or watch it 3 years from now when all of the seasons are complete.
As long as you watch it through.

By the way, off-topic for sure, did you recieve an email I sent you a couple of days ago? It was basically about something I wrote on my blog and would like input on.
http://carloconda.blogspot.com/2008/05/hello-brick-wall.html

Thanks.

DMc said...

Carlo, yes I did receive the email. And I did read your post. I haven't commented for a couple of reasons. First, because I'm in the middle of working on something and when you take that, and then my focus here, everything else tends to drop by the wayside. I've got only so much gumption in me.

The second reason is more basic. I don't have anything to tell you because I simply don't know. The closest I've come to writing on the subject you posit is this post here.

While I sympathize with your issues, I don't really connect with them for the simple reason that I don't share them. I've never really looked into what it takes to get a U.S. visa because I'm a U.S. citizen.

I know that doesn't help you much.

In as much as the internet has helped aspiring writers with blogs and information galore, it also sets people back a bit by having a lot of people get into your position and fall back on, "well what can you tell me about this?"

The reality is that for more than thirty years, Canadian writers and actors have made the leap you're talking about. Some go first and work under the table. Some get jobs and get transferred and then do what they need to do. And some buy their way into the USA. Some win Green Card lotteries.

All the various methods of doing what you want to do are things that you can research, but the best way to do it is not to ask people to comment on your blogpost.

My boy, it's time you got thee to a library, and did your research. Then maybe you can do a blog post that has some concrete answers instead of questions.

Good luck to you, sir.

wcdixon said...

Skins rocks.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the feedback, Denis. I can sense the frusteration, and I'm alright with that. I didn't mean to impose or come off as needy.
I have been doing research, and I consider asking screenwriters in the blogosphere for their opinions to be a part of it.

And I don't see the reason to point out that my post had little information in it. Yes, it contains questions, largely because I had questions to ask. I want to gain insight and perspective on the situation form people in the industry.
I don't think it's reasonable to expect every one of a fledgeling writer's blog posts to be super informative.

Thanks for the link to your blog post. I'll give it a read.

Carlo

DMc said...

You know Carlo, I wasn't the slightest bit frustrated before. I wrote what I wrote to you completely in earnest.

I'm a little frustrated now, though.

Step number one in making it in this industry either in Canada or the U.S. is figuring out how to navigate it. It's extremely Darwinian. And it's not just talent that rises, it's talent that figures out what questions to ask, when to ask them, and how and when to rely on one's own ingenuity.

Having gotten me to engage and try to answer you, I find now that apparently my answer causes you to become defensive. It makes me wish I'd never answered in the first place.

There's a lesson in there, young Jedi, should you choose to parse it.

Anonymous said...

A classic case of miscommunication is all this is.

Future Man said...

Back on topic, that would be Family Guy. I just didn't connect with the comedy in the pilot and second episode, so I tuned out.

But everyone kept referencing the show, so last year I gave it another shot and haven't looked back.

Freakin hilarious

Mef said...

I bailed on 30 Rock after the pilot which I really didn't care for and its second episode.

I gave it another chance after about midway through the first season and have now it's one of my favourite shows.

Cunningham said...

I bailed on LIFE after 1st 2 episodes, then came back to it for the last three to find it much better than I remembered.

Wether it comes back or not I think is waaaaay up in the air - where it's thin.

Anonymous said...

I used to think The Simpsons was an evil show.But this is counting back many many years ago, as a child.

Anonymous said...

DMC, It's good you're giving this another go, because this show has consistently delivered since it began.

A few key points.

Depiction of Domestic Life:

I actually cannot think of another show that has such a realistic portrayal of ordinary domestic life. The details are just so well done. I mean, the parents are scruffy in the morning, wearing pyjamas that no respectable Hollywood type would be caught dead in. The kids go through breakfast like the messy chaotic ritual that it really is, with fruit loops on the table, some in, and some out of the bowls, milk splashed liberally around, Mom rushing to get everyone packed into the car and off to school so she can get get to a part time job...you get the idea.

Morality:

In most of the characters, even the odd recurring ones, there is a certain gravitas and moral ambiguity, and you are never always sure on which side of the line people will fall. As events occur, characters change, and how they respond to the world shifts, changes, evolves.

Writing:

Remember when Mad Men "Dropped the Hammer?" Well, for me, there is a scene like that in Medium. One scene that really stands out for me (perhaps because it resonates so closely with my own personal life) was when Joe DuBois, the husband, is sitting in the Unemployment office, undergoing his weekly round of humiliation in order to get what little benefits he is entitled to, is given a full-on bitch-slap by, of all people, Alvin from the Cosby Show. As DuBois complains about answering the same stupid questions every week, Alvin looks him in the eye and says (Mind you this is a paraphrase as I don't have the script to hand -

"Mr. DuBois, you're a smart man. You're highly educated, so why are you waiting for someone else's permission to earn a living."

At first, completely missing the point, DuBois just gets confused, Later, at home, when he sees his kids lose faith in his Dad-ness, when he is unable to help them with a little science project, it really sinks in that he really is that passive, he really hasn't stretched himself and really, truly tried. Not just at that moment with his children, but in his hunt for new work, and in his quest to support his family. And that night he comes up with a way to increase the efficiency of solar cell... and suddenly he starts taking his own, and his family's destiny into his own hands. Or at least tries to...which brings the realities of domestic life and economic exigencies back into the picture.

Outright SYP terror:

Terror in this show does not come from the big monster, or the raving lunatic, though from time to time a few of those are trotted out for a round of play, but in the soft, ordinary, benign happenings that will irrevocably change or destroy your life. The scene that Bellafante mentions, about the boy in a toy store, was truly one of the most horrifying things I have ever witnessed on television. The Dad is talking to his boss, he doesn't want to, but is pressured into a conference sales call, and while he is distracted, his son sees a funny clown puppet and walks toward it. As the clown puppet moves away, on the back of a man who is not fully visible (only the clown is really shown) the boy follows along, and then he is gone. Then, the other things that Bellefante mentions... the way that the abuse is carried out, the way the scene is shot, how music is used, and the how the child is shown laughing and finding everything just so funny, all while the viewer is rendered entirely speechless by the contrast between the quirky Mr. Rogersness of the tone, and terrible thing we know will happen very, very soon.

Characters:

The key actors in this show are spot on. In fact, unlike with many other shows, especially the police procedurals, there is nothing about any of the leads in Medium that irks me or puts me off they that some do on other shows. I never could get really into shows like Criminal Minds, Without a Trace, Close to Home, because there was always one or two characters who were simply unrecognizable to me as real, normal people.

Writing:

Oh, did I mention this before? Good. 'Cause I want to bring much needed attention to this key point. The writing on this show is excellent, especially by the standards of big network shows. All the stuff I loved about Intelligence, Mad Men, and Breaking Bad, is in Medium. On many shows, there is a way in which things sometimes descend into large, loud, played out matters (politics, discussions of morality, etc) that get all preachy and deviate entirely away from story and character. Think some of the more annoying BSG episodes in season 3. But in Medium, like in Intelligence, Mad Men, and Breaking Bad, "issues" are not presented in black and white, and often operate under the primary pillars of story and character. When the "issues" are touched upon, it's just that. Touched upon, lightly, subtly, with a line here, or a hesitation there. And in this subtle gesture, impact the viewer, the discerning viewer, far more powerfully than might otherwise be possible.

In closing:

Look, there are other shows I look forward to more eagerly each week. Since where I live TV consists of three hundred channels filled with Bedouins talking, praying, or dancing, and iTunes shows me the hand over here, I gotta get my teevee "in other ways." Sorry about that, but that's life for those outside the promised land. Unless you just love watching half to two season runs of failed shows from the US which the networks love to pick up here on the cheap ("Life with Bonnie" anyone? "Crumbs" shall we?) But like I said, there are other shows I wait for more eagerly. There's your BSG, 30 Rock, Heroes, House, Cold Case, The Unit, Supernatural, Chuck, and more. They are all fun, sometimes hit and miss, but when they are good, they're good. But with Medium, the delivery is always solid. Like the temperature in Vancouver, the highs and the lows aren't very far off from each other, and what is left with is a show that is solid and consistent. Then there is the irony... for a show ostensibly about the paranormal, Medium has a far more accurate depiction of normal, everyday life, that pretty much any other show on US network television.1

Anonymous said...

Must be a coincidence that the show is called "Medium".
:P

Teresa said...

I guess the one show I've give a second chance to recently is CSI:New York.

I didn't like the 'feel' of the show when it debuted; something about the choice of lighting? or colour? or setting for the morgue put me off.

They fixed that at some point and now, while it's not at all "must see" I have liked what I've watched.

I've been a Medium fan since day one. The family vibe is a real plus as far as I'm concerned. I really empathise with Joe's plight being married to a psychic... and the father of 3 daughters, and the dawning realization that it's very much 'like Mother like Daughter' in the Dubois family...