Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Californication


I AM LEERY, always, of shows about writers or featuring writers. Yes, yes, I think we are endlessly fascinating. How could I not? I'm just not sure that the world needs to share our solipsism.

The last real Inside-Showbizzy series I loved was The Larry Sanders Show, and I think my unreasonable love for that show is an instructive one. It was the first of the big behind-the-sceners (unless you count Mary Tyler Moore or Dick Van Dyke, and I don't.) but the juice of that show didn't necessarily come from its setting. It came from a triumverate of truly amazing characters: Artie, the always on the edge of a beating hardass producer, venal, complex, damaged Larry, and the sublime Hank Kingsley. (How is it possible that the show never made a big impact, yet everyone seems to know, "Hey now!" Does Howard Stern really have that much power?)

Shows that are too inside baseball never age well. I liked Murphy Brown, but man, those shows are well nigh unwatchable now.

When Studio 60 came along, I was willing to give it a flyer because of Sorkin. And we all know how that turned out.

Entourage, interestingly enough, bores me the more it becomes about the business, and the less it focuses on those four guys. I think giving Ari his own plots free of the boys -- while inevitable -- was probably a big creative mistake.

And 30 Rock -- well, the TV characters on 30Rock are the lamest -- Jenna, Tracy Jordan...it's Alec Baldwin, Fey, and the Intern who sell that show.

See how I just rationalized all the inside baseball shows I watch as not being inside baseball? Nifty trick, self delusion.

Anyway, on to Californication. I have to admit, I was pretty held by it. And yup, this is not a likable character. I mean, that speech he gives in the restaurant to dress down his date is just...horrific.

He also suffers from Tommy Gavin syndrome. There is something off the charts ridiculous about that many women leaping over themselves to get a piece of the Duchovny magic. And flash their bits in the process. There are a lot of actresses in Hollywood, yes there are.

And yet...

The show charms. It does. It helps that Natasha McElhone and Duchovny have a lot of chemistry. (I think Natasha McElhone is one of the most beautiful women on TV. Finally, a woman that I could see someone being all moony over for years. Duchovny sure has good luck with redheads.)

The late-episode reveal of the nature of one of buddy's bed partners is probably what everybody's going to be talking about...and it was a pretty sickening reveal... it was a little uncomfortable that they played the same beat as Rescue Me (when the father is delighted by the possibilty that his daughter's a lesbian. That was funny the first time...)

But all that being said, and despite serious reservations about the character, (and serious envy about the Soundtrack...I mean, who digs up My Morning Jacket singing Rocket Man, AND licences Sympathy by the freaking Stones?) I think I'll be watching. The dialogue was cutting, and there were some genunie surprises.

Like, say, I never thought I'd find myself laughing so hard at a donkey punch.

I think it comes down to Duchovny. This is the David Duchovny that you saw on Larry Sanders, and in the extras on the new excellent Sanders set. He's loose, he's enjoyable and charismatic and low key. David Duchovny is yet another one of those actors (like Jimmy Smits) who's made for TV. He looks so damn comfortable out up there on that screen, and he's just so likable, that I want to spend time with him, even if he is a shit.

But hocheemama that was a lot of nudity. That's a lot of closed set days there, by gum.

For Golick's take on Californication, click here. What did y'all think?

14 comments:

Cunningham said...

Natasha McElhone is one of the most beautiful women period.

Christina said...

Ditto Natasha McElhone. I have a girl crush on her ever since seeing her in Laurel Canyon.

Unknown said...

How good to see a fellow Natascha fan! :)
Feel free to visit my site about her:
www.natascha-mcelhone.net

Alex Epstein said...

Y'know, I couldn't stand this show. I have a deep aversion to writers whining about writer's block. I tend to assume that shows about obnoxious, whiny characters getting laid right and left are wish-fulfillment by their obnoxious, whiny writers who are, probably, not getting laid. So I couldn't sit through this one. I had it on DVD, and I tried to watch it twice, and both times it turned me right off.

I wonder what happens in the second episode? Because I didn't see a hook there.

DMc said...

Yeah, you're saying pretty much the same things I said in my post, Alex. Weird. No one is more surprised than me that I liked it. I like it less when I think about it, but enjoyed it while I watched it. On paper this is a show I should hate. But I didn't. And I think I'm putting that down to some great casting.

I dont want to see anything about writers anymore, either. Boring.

tvho said...

i read the pilot, and thought it was really well-written but so banal, somehow, so... wish-fulfillment writ large. It seemed clear that it had been green-lit by some network BSD who's contemplating leaving his wife for an underage hottie and he thought YEAH, baby, YEAH, this series speaks the TRUTH!

And i think Duchovny is an awful awful actor. I love seeing him as a guest on a talk show but I, uh, didn't feel his character's pain. I didn't get his feelings, because I don't think Duchovny knows how to feel a feeling in that acting-thing way. Interesting to read that Mrs David Duchovny, Tea Leoni, told him not to do it. I think she's the brainiac in the family. and, obviously, the only actor as well.

And the donkey-punch was badly staged and unbelieveable. And that kind of underage girl who's really a 40-year-old hardbitten reporter in disguise - have mercy. what a bullshit character.

I can't believe how many reviewers have weighed in favourably on this show. the emperor has no CLOTHES, baby! i mean, obviously and metaphorically.

Cunningham said...

I wonder what happens in the second episode? Because I didn't see a hook there.

Alex, there's no greater hook than the question you just asked.

It seemed clear that it had been green-lit by some network BSD who's contemplating leaving his wife for an underage hottie and he thought YEAH, baby, YEAH, this series speaks the TRUTH!

Shelley, divorce in California is too expensive. The BSD is trying to figure out how he can keep the wife AND the mistress...and hide it in his expense account.

Jill Golick said...

You guys have much higher standards than me. When a show fits a blow job, three euphemisms for clitoris and a little alphabetizing in the tease, I don't even notice that it's about a writer. As Denis says, it has a few surprises, some funny lines and a great soundtrack.

wcdixon said...

What Jill said.

Good Dog said...

Ditto.

"The little man in the boat"... Genius!

DMc said...

Whoa, whoa whoa!

Gentlemen, Ladies, let's at least try to keep things PG-13 here.

Matt said...

It would have been more believable if he shrugged off people's compliments about his writing talent. Instead he agreed that he was talented.

What writer believes they're any good?

Anyway, the "writing" stuff didn't bother me as much as I thought it would.

It felt like a pilot. I'm going to give it a few more episodes before I say whether or not I like it.

(but so far, I kinda like it)

Cunningham said...

It would have been more believable if he shrugged off people's compliments about his writing talent. Instead he agreed that he was talented.

No he agreed that he was talented once. He described himself to Mia as a "one hit wonder." He also said, "Writer's write. I...used to..."

I think that what's going to keep us coming back -- asking how this wreck of a man redeems himself in the eyes of the woman he totally screwed things up with... that's the story here.

Deep down under all the sex and drug references and self loathing, we're watching a love story, and I really don't think any of us are soooo jaded that we can't get into a "really good" (your mileage may vary) love story. Especially a love story where the hero learns to love himself first.

I want to see how Hank gets himself out of the crap he's done to himself. I want to see if Mia uses her leverage to blackmail him. I want to see Hank crawl out of heartbreak, and figure out how to be a good father to his daughter even when his ex isn't in the room. I want to see the point when Hank can be in a scene and NOT be a whiny ass.

Cause as we've seen already, there's going to be a lot of twists and turns along the way.

Karen Hill said...

Yeah, yeah, yeah, Shelley, but...

For some reason, I'm much more willing to give it my usual three ep scan than I was with John from Cincinnati.

For three weeks running, I just wanted to punch someone after watching JFC. I realized it was time to pull the plug.

Fare thee well, John. We hardly knew ya.