
I was really reticent about posting anything negative about the show at all, because I thought that those premiere numbers and the coverage was such a good step in the right direction for CBC that I don't want to rain on the parade. But let's face it, no show is perfect. And if CBC wants a long term hit with the show, there's definitely some things that need a good tweak.
I did not think the Pilot of Mosque was very good television. The most interesting thing about it was the concept. The execution, I thought, was lacking. I thought Episode Two was better, which was a personal relief.
You can argue all you want about the backseat driving discussions -- ie: the howiwouldhavedoneits -- it should have been edgier, etc, etc, but on the merits of the show they say they're going for -- a straight down the middle family, wide appeal comedy, here's what I think's good, and what needs attention in the next batch of eps (assuming, as seems likely, that the show gets a pickup.)
The Good:
- Babur. I think this character is clearly the Hiro of the show. (See what I did there? I made a pun, kind of, on the guy from Heroes. Aren't I just so...oh wait...arrrggh...I just broke my arm patting myself on the back. ow. ow.) Babur is a muslim Archie Bunker. He's intolerant and dogmatic, conservative and doesn't question things. He's rigid and inflexible, but still somehow pretty lovable. The masterstroke: making him a single father of a Canadianized girl. I wish they'd hit a little harder the fact that he didn't push the hijab question because he wants his daughter to fit in, not because he didn't want to talk to her about her period. This plotline has the most juice in the show.
- Yasir. He proves it on 24, but CarloRota is clearly a star. He's got presence for miles, a good nature, and you just want to spend time with him.
- Sheila McCarthy. I think her character is odd. It's problematic to use her, as they did in the pilot, to express "outsider" views of Islam (like being more ignorant of how Ramadan starts, or what foods are traditional, etc, when in her backstory she converted long enough ago that she has an adult daughter with Yasir. But in both the pilot and the 2nd episode, she had little comic awkward moments -- with the press in Ep. 1 and the Protesters in Ep.2 where she showed a goofy looseness that was winning.)
- The occasional sharp line. The joke about the pot-smoking guy joining the United Church, the "You dress like a protestant. You mean Prostitute. No I mean protestant." Occasionally, there are lines that land that are good. It would be easier if the premises were inherently more funny, but there you go.
- Zaib. He looks good, he could probably be good in his role as the Imam, but he mugs and overacts insanely. The guy needs to be reined in, hard. It's like he believes no one will find it funny unless he actually rolls his eyes. (I'm not dreaming that, am I? He really did roll his eyes?)
- Wake Up, White People! Neil Crone, who plays the right wing radio host, is a great comedian who is absolutely stranded in his role. It's decent, at least, that they managed to spin it in Episode 2 that he was fomenting intra-Muslim conflict as well as conflict with the community...but come on. Compare this character to Maurice Minnifield in Northern Exposure. Where does he go in three eps? What is the slightest bit interesting about him?
- Fatima I hate to say this, but the fact that Sheila McCarthy's character got to use her as a tactic to play on the feminist protestor's political correctness (because she's a person of color, see?) was the best use of this character so far. She plays the same role in the show as Babur. Two characters who play exactly the same role does not work in Comedy. You don't need two Dumb Joeys...you don't need two space cadet Phoebes, and you don't need Fatima and Babur, both. One's gotta show a different side or it's gonna be a bitch trying to service them both. It's not enough that she's a person of color. What makes her distinct and unique? She was useful as a plot point (she's a woman and wants the barrier too!) but useful as a plot point does not a good character make.
- The Imam vs. Rayann. The standard Romantic, "they hate each other, but they like each other" thing that they're going to play here is a big problem for one big reason: there's nothing keeping them apart. She's a progressive single Muslim, He's a progressive single Muslim. They live in a town where Muslims are a serous minority. They agree on most things theologically. What's keeping them apart? What's the obstacle? Diane was brainy and Sam was dumb and brawny. Then they got together, and once it didn't work, the obstacle was external: Frasier. (Thanks to my friend with the house for this point.) Also, they missed an opportunity by putting the most interesting thing about Rayann: that she discovered her faith as an adult, in the backstory. Why would you not have dramatized this journey in the show? Could have been a brilliant way in. If they're not careful, Rayann could turn into a scold.
- The Direction. From scenes that are overacted, to scenes that are staged wrong, the comedy is consistently crushed through bad choices in shooting. You also get the sense that there's A LOT of editing surgery going on to put this together. Two examples that explain all: The Pilot, where the Imam's on the phone and is mistaken for a terrorist. The women in front of him reacts, big, and goes off. If only that was staged as a slow burn with her behind him, it would have actually have been funny. Dont' announce, "ATTENTION AUDIENCE, JOKE AHEAD!" Trust them to find funny things funny. Example two is in Ep 2, the sequence where the women get on the board to prevent the men from putting up the barrier again. This could have been rich. But it was shot indistinctly, there was no build to it, and a potentially funny sequence (Imagine what Niles Crane would have done here, or hell, Lucy) was as flat as the board it was played on.
- The Scheduling. Good God Almighty. The one thing the CBC has going for it is that because it's not a slave to simulcasts, it can put a show on and run it and not move it, so people can get used to when it's on. So they premiere in one slot, move, run a rerun, then get pre-empted. Are they TRYING to shake off 500, 000 viewers, or what.
A really clever look at Canadian society, seen from the point of view of people who are outsiders in some ways and insiders in others. Sometimes it takes a fish out of water to notice how odd terrestrial critters really are. This is where the show really fails for me. I don't feel its white characters are keenly observed at all. They seem to be mostly racist and all stupid. Whereas I bet most white people in the Canadian Prairies are extremely tolerant, and racists are in the minority. Most Canadians bend over backwards to be nice to minorities (except possibly not to the Natives), reserving their passive aggression and venom for empowered white people. Instead of making out every white character to be a buffoon, why not write episodes based on actual observation of white society, from a Muslim's perspective? How white people's kids are defiant to their faces? How white women wear push-up bras and low-cut shirts but get mad when people stare at their breasts? How white people worship an impoverished, anti-intellectual, rabble-rousing mystic carpenter and cherish money, hierarchy and dogma? Etc.I think the show really does have promise. It's still not my type of humor, but I wish CBC every success with it, and I hope it will lead to lots more "higher concept, boundary breaking" shows on CBC.
And like Matt Watts observed a few days ago, it would be nice, now that they have their feel-good Muslim comedy, if at least one or two of those new boundary breakers was pitched to be edgier and more clever, a la the last time CBC really, really broke through with a critical homegrown hit: those first glorious eps of The Newsroom. (Before Auteur Ken disappeared up his own digestive tract, I mean.)
UPDATE 02/20/2007: I'm closing comments for this post. I'm tired of deleting ignorance. That is all.
22 comments:
I'm not entirely convinced of Fatima's redundancy as a character just yet. She might yet serve as a useful reminder of there being at least three sides to any given argument. Which may not fit sit-com standard, but with luck and a bit of additional work that can become one of this show's strengths. If it isn't already such.
Dwight, due respect but what you just wrote has nothing whatsoever to do with comedy. You don't create a comic character to give a side to an argument. You create a comic character to be funny. The easiest way to do that is to give them a point of view that is at odds with the rest of the group. But in a practical way, if there's redundancy, you wind up figuring out who you parcel out the points to this week. It becomes a drag on your story momentum and your script.
I have no doubt the reason you state is exactly the reason they made her part of the ensemble. But that kind of thinking, while good for the "cultural" bonafides, is anathema to the comedy. The cart is before the goat, so to speak.
9 characters is probably too many...
- P
I don't know anything about how a TV show is made. All I know is that I laughed when watching "Little Mosque" and felt entertained without feeling like my intelligence was assualted.
Ihath, that's great. Glad to hear it. What I'm talking about here is stuff I hope that would help those audience numbers (2.2 million to 1.2 million in two showings, remember) to stabilize.
Curiosity accounts for a big tune in but over the long haul, you want an audience to come back week, after week, after week. The question really is: were you, and lots and lots of people like you, entertained enough that you'll make a point to keep coming back?
Because that's what makes a longstanding hit.
Tellulah, those terms, like everything in comedy, is subjective. I'm sure some people use the terms the way you do in the beginning of your comment. But even by the end of your comment you've proven that the terms can't be applied hard and fast.
It's comedy. Roll with it.
Shucks! I lost it, but Netscape had an article about Little Mosque on the Prairie. Nothing big, just saying it got good numbers and something to the effect that this show could only happen in Canada because Canadians make such a point to be tolerant.
This one from Variety maybe?
I didn't find the pilot of Little Mosque very funny at all, but I want it to do well and am glad that at least 1.2 million people disagreed with me enough to tune in for the second ep. I gave up when they made it even slightly hard for me to find.
There's still a curiousity factor at work, and so far no one I know in real life actually likes the show yet, though they're at least watching and talking about it. Around my watercooler there's a lot of grumblings about it being offensive on both sides of the Muslim/dumb prairie person equation and not being funny, and being an example of crap Cancon we pay for with our hard earned tax dollars, etc. But I know a bunch of malcontents. Time will tell what core audience it will attract and I hope the show finds its footing.
I feel a little sorry for the people behind the show, having to endure the kind of scrunity that makes it seem like the future of the CBC, and Canadian television, and comedy, and man's inhumanity to man, and world peace ... is all riding on them. Not sorry enough that I want to stop scrutinizing, of course.
I find the mention of Maurice on Northern Exposure intriguing. It got me thinking the show may have fared better as an hour long ensemble dramedy that really took in the whole town of Mercy. Not to say the storyline in episode two merited an hour itself, but with all those characters there was the potential for plots and sub-plots that would have. Also if the audience was expecting the comedy to come from character moments rather than punchlines (and wasn't expecting every scene to be funny), there may have been fewer rumblings of disappointment.
Just an off the cuff thought - I may change my mind the second I hit "Publish". :)
Repeating the same character? The only time I've seen it work was on Newhart: Remember Larry, his brother Darryl, and his other brother Darryl? But remember that brother Darryl didn't talk. Neither did other brother Darryl...
I had selfish reasons for wanting it to be good but, frankly, I thought it dreadfully unfunny.
Yeah, that's the article.
Larry, Darryl and Darryl made a great running joke. . .that somewhat points out the very issue!
Guys, if you're going to come down on the slag side of Mosque, I wish you'd take the moment and register with blogger to comment. It says you need to start a blog but you can quit that step.
blogger.com
It's just that when you slag anonymously, it carries less weight, and I get to carry the carping myself;
If you must post anonymously, I'd appreciate it if you'd at least leave your name and where you're located.
That way we weed out the disgruntled TV people grinding axes, m'kay?
How's this. I registered. And I, like most, want the show to succeed.
I do.
I just REALLY want the writing to be better. Like you.
And I'll admit to being someone who has had a project in development at CBC that went nowhere. So yes, okay, perhaps I have an axe to grind, but I SWEAR I really really REALLY want the show to succeed.
I'm very serious. I really do.
The more successful shows by people of colour the better. And I'll admit that the producer side of me has already pointed to the 2 mill viewers of LMOTP and I have said that Canada is ready to watch a show starring people of colour. But the writer in me needed to confess anonymously on this site that as a person of colour, I really REALLY want to see more complexity in the white characters.
Vociferous, thanks for the good news. I grew up Out West before resettling in Ottawa, and it's good to know that there's still lots of Sane People back there.
That said, I'd be lying if I said there weren't people who either think or run their shows like Fred Tupper on the radio dials of Canada. I know of at least one person whom I suspect of like-mindedness to him here in my current backyard.
I agree with you on the Fatima character, the direction, pretty much everything.
I still think the show has heart and people are gonna stick with it, but I did resolve to be more positive and less cynical in 2007.
I am also arbitrarily decreeing this the year of Carlo Rota. He's always been a delightful skither but this year he's grown into a charming hottie, and his Morris is the perfect foil for Chloe on 24.
What does "turn into a scold" mean?
Really? We can't parse that one out?
"turn into a scold" ie: "become a nag"
a scold = one who scolds
Here's a link for Muslim perspectives... it seems there isn't much of an appreciation among the mainstream Muslims--- for one main reason: It does NOT represent us. It could be more realistic and still be funny. It isn't either.
Musings of a Muslim Mind
Well, Amad, I'd caution anybody against thinking what they read on blogs as "representative of what the mainstream thinks." There's nothing scientific about the cross section you're talking about, and the numbers (still over 1 million for ep 3) would seem to indicate that it is reaching people.
However, I also think that when you're talking about comedy, the object is not necessarily to be "an accurate portrayal"
If anything, most effective comedies hint at larger truths through exaggeration.
No, I still think the most important measure for the show is not whether it reflects your community, or any community.
I think it's most important that it be funny.
Housekeeping note:
I deleted two comments because the same comments were made on another Little Mosque thread. We've got the agenda-ites descending. I think we're prolly back to comment registration soon...
And one more from our old buddy MAX, back from the right wing funny farm. Wow, the ground's shifted since last he fulminated, but I just don't feel like having my name connected to hate speech. I love having a prerogative.
Post a Comment