How Corner Gas Ruined Everything
[CANADIAN TV] The narrative used to be easy. It went like this:
"Canadians don't want to watch Canadian shows."
That statement was a powerful defence. It's the reason why, in 1999, the broadcasters successfully got the CRTC to relax Canadian Content regulations on homegrown comedy and drama.
Actually, what they did was allow networks to count things like lifestyle shows and light entertainment and reality toward their CanCon quotas. The result, by now, is well known. There were eleven drama series on the air in 1999 on the various Canadian networks. Those numbers dropped by half within a year or so. These days, you'd be hard pressed to find more than one drama or comedy show on any of the Canadian networks at one time or another. The private networks continue to make their money by buying U.S. shows at the L.A. screenings, programming them at the same time as the U.S. networks, to take advantage of their promotional spending and then, as a final gift, the CRTC allows them to substitute their signal over the American networks, so that even if you watch the NBC show on NBC, you're actually watching CTV or Global, and their commercials. Then, they fill out their schedule and CanCon with cheap shows like ET Canada or E Talk Daily -- which they sell as -- and here's the final insult -- a way to promote Canadian stars!
At the time, Canadian creatives tried to make the case that maybe the reason people weren't watching had something to do with a lack of promotion, bouncing the few series they did do around the schedule to accomodate money-making U.S. simulcasts, dumping homegrown series in unflattering slots where they were designed to fail (like scheduling TRADERS for years against E.R. which was then Canada's Number 1 show.)
But the Canadian Association of Broadcasters (the broadcaster lobby group) had a powerful, though passive ally: viewers themselves.
Because they could also point to viewers and hear things like, "Canadian shows look cheap." "They're not good." "There's no one in them that I know."
That's a hard thing to hear -- and unfortunately, it's often true. I'll return to that later.
So how did Corner Gas ruin everything?
By exposing the fracture and fiction points that underpin the laughable toy that is the domestic Canadian broadcast industry.
Let's take the first canard out. More than a million people watch Corner Gas in Canada every week, and have since it came out. Most week it's closer to 1.5 million. To give context to that number, remember that Canada is a nation of 30 million people. So this is roughly equivalent to over 30 million viewers a week in the USA -- which is way, way, way better than most of the shows that are considered hits in the USA. Better than Lost. Better than Prison Break. Better than House.
What's more, viewers have followed Corner Gas whenever it's been moved. It's been bounced around the schedule on CTV a lot. And viewers always find it. They want to watch it.
They've released three Corner Gas DVD sets. They sell incredibly well. Brent Butt tours across Canada to sold-out shows on the strength of the recognition he gains off Corner Gas.
Yet no one -- and I mean no one -- asks what does Corner Gas does right that everybody else gets wrong? This show shreds the argument made by the CAB -- that no one wants to watch Canadian shows -- but they still make it. And no one challenges them.
Why?
Because there are other people who don't want to face up to what Corner Gas does, and does well. And does differently. Because if they did, they might have to change what they do, and how they do it.
So what does Corner Gas do differently?
Well - first off, they do in the neighborhood of 20 shows a year. Not 8. Not 6. Not 13. So there's an actual industry involved in producing them. People who work on the show make good money for their efforts, so they attract the top talent. Corner Gas has a writing staff, four or five strong, who write in story rooms. They break stories together, just like U.S. shows do. There isn't one writer pumping it all out by themselves in a room, and they don't have to write it all themselves just to make enough money to live for four months. It's not a freelance situation where the scripts get written, passed off to the producers, and then the writers go home and aren't involved in the process when the thing gets made. The producers listen to the writers. They focus on making the show. The writers are there in Saskatchewan while the thing is being made. They are also working while they're shooting, which means that courses can be changed, things punched up, even as the show goes to the floor.
In other words, part of the reason Corner Gas works is because it's made in the same way that a U.S. show is made: hire top talent. Have a writing room. Do enough episodes. Have everybody on hand to make sure it all goes well.
Now, what about the content? How is Corner Gas different than other shows made in Canada? For that, let's turn to John Doyle, who wrote this in response to the news that Gas has been sold to syndication in the U.S. and lotsa countries 'round the world...including, interestingly, Iraq.
Corner Gas is our kind of humour and its success is also an inconvenient truth for many people in the Canadian TV racket. People in the racket who think they're smart and sophisticated sneer at Corner Gas. The deft, light sophistication of it escapes them. In truth, many are livid and seethe with envy and resentment. Corner Gas is eight characters in the middle of nowhere, affably swapping absurdly daft jokes.Doyle comes perilously close to touching the third rail here... but he doesn't come out and say it. I will.
A lot of Canadian TV creative types are snobs. They are out of touch with the Canadian viewing audience. And that's why they make bad shows.
I love TV. I love quality shows like The Sopranos, and I love lowbrow, well executed stuff like that first glorious season of The O.C. Sure, I'll be snarky about the stuff I don't think is worthy, like According to Jim or JAG or whatever...but I know that people like them, and you know what? That's fine.But often when I move and shake (in the former case, slowly, like a manatee, and in the latter, kind of like the Michelin man) at industry functions, I find myself out of step. Because a whole lot of people want to talk about making something "groundbreaking" and "important" and "not like you usually see on TV" and not something "entertaining" that people "want to watch."
And this bias is nowhere more nakedly exposed than in attitudes toward Corner Gas. In the leadup to the execrable Rumours, my former boss Moses Znaimer was widely quoted as saying that show was going to be "the anti-Corner Gas." Well, it certainly turned out that way, didn't it? A couple weeks back, The Sun ran an article with cast members from Rumours blaming the audience for no one watching the show.
That's right. The audience is the problem. We should blame the audience. Because, (all together now!) "Canadians don't want to watch Canadian shows!"
Except Corner Gas.
Oh. Doesn't count. Right.
I've stood around with writers from Corner Gas as people at industry events have pooh-poohed their show and its success. I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen it with my own eyes, and heard it with my own ears.
Below, I linked to an article from the Edmonton Sun, where Brigitte Bako was talking about her show, G-Spot. Here's that link again, and here's a quote from that article, below:
While the show is set in L.A., it's filmed in Toronto, which wasn't a problem for Bako, just so long as the show didn't look like a Canadian production. Touting shows like North of 60 and Corner Gas as benchmarks, the best Canuck TV has to offer, is a sad joke, she contends.Now, let's be clear here. G-Spot, which is a Canadian take on Sex in the City, is shown on TMN and Movie Central. It's about to enter its third season.
"I've actually lived in the U.S. longer than Canada, but I love my country. You should see me during the Olympics; I want everyone to die except Canada.
"But in production meetings with my crew, I'd say, 'If this looks like a Canadian show, I will shoot myself and then all of you. We have so much talent in Canada, we can do better.'
"I have no competition, in my opinion. I happen to think most stuff in Canada sucks ass, and you can quote me on that. I don't like one Canadian show. I watch it because that's what I'm supposed to do, to see what's out there. It's not funny, it's very politically correct and nobody steps outside of the box. And I don't know why, but when things are shot in Canada they sort of look like they were shot in a tin can."
And no one cares.
There is no buzz around G-Spot. Whatever I think of actors writing shows, the blithe way in which Bako dismisses a show that reaches 1 to 1.5 million viewers a week, and praises her own work, reveals all. And yet I would have never thought to criticize Bako or her show. Except. Except. The attitude she shows, and the way no one challenges her on it, says everything about the bizarro world of Canadian TV. Bako feels free to say something like she doesn't watch a single Canadian show.
Well, you know what?
Corner Gas. Davinci's Inquest. Intelligence. Slings & Arrows. Trailer Park Boys.
I watch em all. Because I love'em. Some are connecting and high rated, some are merely critical darlings. But they're all great. And they're all shows that are completely unlike anything you see in the USA. Unlike, say, a Sex in the City clone.
On a smaller scale, the snobbery that surrounds Corner Gas and its success is even more pronounced toward Trailer Park Boys. It doesn't matter that the guys get mobbed everywhere they go. It doesn't matter that a thousand people turn up to a personal appearance in a Toronto theatre, people of all ages, people who look like they're working class and young and old and brown and white and asian...you know, like Canada...it doesn't matter that there's a movie, because the cabal that rules the roost here still want to get their money for producing highbrow, "important" or "different" fare that doesn't connect. And the only way they can keep doing that is by running down the shows that do connect.
Nobody asks, really, why TPB connects, either. Except maybe, again, John Doyle:
As any fool knows by now, Trailer Park Boys is terribly sweet. It's just that there's a lot of swearing, drinking, and dope-smoking, and occasionally there's utterly innefectual gunplay. What it shares with Corner Gas is the sweetness.I get the sweetness. The TPB movie, for all its greasy madness, is very sweet indeed. The Christmas special is actually touching.

Yes, we in Canada are regulatorily beset. But the other dirty part of the equation is this: the people who've gotten the funding for too long, have been exactly the kind of people who hate things like Corner Gas. The show's success, and the indifference with which they treat the fact of its success, shows that they don't care about the audience.
And the CAB types are more than happy to cynically throw their lot in with these types, because so long as they keep making these shows that no one wants to see, the more they can keep funding requirements at bay, keep pushing the "Canadians don't want to see Canadian shows" canard, and focus on how they make their real (easy) money: buying U.S. fare and having big brother protect them while they filter it to a Canadian audience, and reap the advertising rewards.
Understand this: I'm not saying you can't like Corner Gas. I've made this point before, but it always bears repeating. Being professional means separating out your personal taste from your professional opinion. I don't watch Ugly Betty, or listen to Cedric The Entertainer comedy records, but I understand why they work. I would personally never choose Leno over Letterman, but I understand what his appeal is to those who do so. Understanding the audience is my job. It has to be. And if you work in the business, no matter where you work in the business, it's your job too. And that's why I have no problem saying this:
If you can't learn from Corner Gas, I don't think you should be in this industry.
For the way it exposes the hypocrisy at the heart of the Canadian domestic production industry, well...I think that's the most important way in which Corner Gas ruined everything.
And maybe, just maybe...it points to the way out.

29 rumbles:
Another excellent commentary, D. With a laugh out loud to boot:
"...when I move and shake (in the former case, slowly, like a manatee, and in the latter, kind of like the Michelin man)..."
Not even sure what that means exactly but it made me smile.
Hog that radio mic...
Thank you for so eloquently saying much of what I, too, believe. Comments such as those made by Bako drive me nuts. Like its some kind of "cool" diss. There are absolutely problems in our industry creatively, bureaucratically - what industry doesn't face them? But it bothers me to see shows that entertain, that clearly connect, whether or not I personally watch them, dissed for not being edgy or groundbreaking or dark or whatever. What's wrong with fun or affable or gasp - even sweet? I love HBO and its fare but I also love a well-made romantic comedy (few and far between). There is so much of a struggle to even get something made in this country, that wouldn't it be nice to have it examined and critiqued on the basis of how good a story it is, how well it entertains, not whether it fits some cynical-cooler-than-thou mentality? And for those who are able to dismiss everything Canada produces with one sweeping gesture, I would challenge them that if they don't like it, then step up to the plate and do better. Don't take our tax credits and bitch.
I'm going to take issue with your math and say it's more like 20 million than 30, but that's just me being picky :-)
Part of me agrees with you. Part of me, no. I'm not sure the solution is more episodes (see my reply to Will's most recent post on Unexplained Images). How they run Corner Gas? Yes. Well run. We could all learn.
There are other examples of well run shows that don't get attention or discussion. Nobody's talking about Degrassi or Instant Star or even The Dragon's Den (which finally broke 500,000 viewers amidst a contestant controversy - see Diane's blog for more details).
This raises another question ... why do we only discuss the failures? Why not the successes?
Depending on how you define successful, you could even include Falcon Beach and Whistler. Neither have been barn burners domestically (passable but not hits) but they are selling like hotcakes internationally. That must count for something.
And I loved the manatee reference, too! That's one of my favourite things about hanging out in Key West ... the sea cows.
hey thanks Denis
I'm one of the writers and I have heard lots of industry people disparage the show. Oh well price of success.
And I don't mind people not liking it either, i mean after all 28.5 million people aren't watching it too.
you know what most of the writers on the cg staff think of cg? We think it's a pretty good show. A pretty good show that caught on for lots of reasons that have been mentioned elsewhere. I know at the start we were just trying to make a pretty good show that had some laughs and made sense.
I'd love to figure out a way to make a pretty good canadian movie.
I'm glad you like it.
Mark
I see ads for Corner Gas about eighteen times a week. CTV promotes it like crazy. And CTV are members of CAB, are they not? It seems like they care about Corner Gas getting an audience. I realize CAB represents many more interests than CTV's (assuming they also represent CTV's -- I'm not in TV.)
I see CTV have about 30 episodes of CG available to watch online. I will give the show a closer look. I like Doyle and generally count on him to know what he's talking about, and if he says CG has "deft, light sophistication," that sounds good to me. But the example he gives in the next sentence after what you quoted --
"Somebody makes a remark about Oscar (Eric Peterson) always bickering with Emma (Janet Wright). Oscar mishears, and declares that he never dickers. He always pays full price. Then he calls somebody a jackass."
-- doesn't sound like light, deft sophistication to me. (And again, I'm not in what Doyle calls "the TV racket.") It sounds like a good old gag. Nothing wrong with a good old gag.
I love Trailer Park Boys but haven't seen the movie or Xmas special so, I gather, have been spared much of the sweetness... happily. I like the TPB stupid, raging, and vicious.
Finally, I remember hearing Moses Znaimer saying that about Rumours -- the anti-Corner Gas. I took him to mean Rumours would have characters who are sexually active, not that the show would be funny...and that has turned out to be true. If Rumours has snob appeal, it is lost on me, and I like to think I can appreciate the obscurest, uppitiest shit Canadian TV has to offer. I watched, and actually enjoyed, every episode of At the Hotel. I recall Rumours was meant to have worldwide mass appeal; adapted from a hit show in Quebec, it was supposed to be something people would want to watch in English, in Spanish, in Portuguese.... Is it failing because it doesn't have enough (or any) sweetness? That could be one reason.
And I've never heard of the G-Spot woman.
I was going to ask how the math works on comparing ratings, but felt dumb. Can I pretend Caroline just asked instead?
The Dragons' Den controversy was from Inside the CBC. Bill Brioux, who I haven't decided if I trust or not (he loved Rumours), says the ratings plummeted after the CBC started publicizing how much they'd increased. But at 380,000 being the number it plummeted to, it's doing better than a lot of CBC shows, which he points out. As someone said at TV, Eh?, though, that article only focuses on the new series - without stating that intention - and turns a blind eye to better rated returning series. Where's the mention that the Mercer Report and 22 Hours are beating their American competition? Proving Caroline's point that we focus on the failures?
But then it's hard to define success here when you've got the CBC publicly setting the bar at a number their shows aren't even close to reaching, and when only one Canadian scripted show (Corner Gas) is in the top 30 in the ratings. I'd hate to define success simply as "it sells well to foreign markets." Canadian shows played after midnight in Mexico, and Canadian TV movies popped up on long-distances buses. I'm not sure that's success - I'm guessing it was cheap filler.
I think I've recovered from my bout of pessimism anyway. DMc kind of made sense on the radio. "Give us more funding from the vats of money those broadcasters are making hand over fist already on American shows, so we can make more, better shows" is an argument I can wrap my head around, and I don't think the "Canadian TV sucks" people can argue with it too much either.
Of course, my math is off.
1.5 million viewers a week, a few people have helpfully pointed out, is only equivalent to 15 million viewers a week in the USA. Not quite the 30 I claimed. But still, CSI got 15.9 million viewers in the USA last week. Survivor got 15.5, Ugly Betty 11.1, ER 13.9, and HOUSE, which scored its best numbers of the fall last week, 17.2 million viewers.
so though my scale was off, my point was not.
Amen. Couldn't have put it, and won't try to put it, better.
I believe youve hit one of the nails in the coffin lid of canadian entertainment shows on the head. I believe however, the hold of the nails are weakening and the entertainers are looking for blood. WE LIVE! CAB benefits from making poor shows, yes. Corner Gas has made a success and deserves it's attention, whether it's my taste or not doesn't matter. Your argument that CAB benefits from the propagated lie that canadians won't or don't want to watch Canuck tv is true, and only part of a very complex situation. Contextually, we should not forget that America dominates ruthlessly the entire entertainment culture of the world. They rule distribution with an iron fist. They do not accept foreign product on their domestic system. Protectionism is what they practise in this and other industries. It affects us profoundly. The role of a smuggler is a analogy that I have embraced because it is how foreign product enters the us, it comes in off or under the radar and finds an audience occassionally, often enough to sustain us in our own markets. When people legitimately criticize the look of canuck tv, and it does have a look many times that does flag it, they notice it for no one particular reason, but many: one of which is the nasty habit of networks pumping up the light for broadcast, so that the best efforts of the d.o.p. are undermined. They do this because somewhere network lore has decided that people don't like to squint to see things in shows that are lit with light and shadow. Yes, actors are often unknown, unknown but not inexperienced. However, it has been my experience that many shows are run by the heavy hand of the nets and they either hire the same old folks who have yet to create a hit, but who play the game and support their submissions to the CRTC with letters of support. Truth be that this is a small community and wo betide anyone who criticizes the big players. There are more than a few scandals out there to be uncovered. One area which is worth your investigating is the numbers game. As far as the comments on writer's rooms go, I have long and varied experience, and a well stocked writer's room is no guarantee of successful scripts. and successful scripts are not guarantee of a successful show, and a well made show is no guarantee of exposre, time slot, etc. The us has long developed writers as the primary voice on television writing, but this continues to be an uphill battle for canadians, who still suffer under the rule of the line producer mentality. This is a historical development. We do also not have the history of writers in entertainment as the us does. Comparisons held and hinder our own development. Writing for t.v. is not easy. It is a craft that takes many years of production experience to hone to a capable standard. When there are a mere handful of opportunities, many of canada's writers never integrate into the business. Their first experiences are often bloody affairs that either cripple the writer or send them packing south, where canuck writers abound, many of them in success. Lastly, the media monopolies here prevent access, promotion or positive criticism. It's my opinion that only concerted political pressure from everyone will have any positive result. I have been both lucky and supported in my career here and south, but I have also spent many years slugging it out on the killing floor. It is this latter experience that has been most beneficial. It is now a very rare opportunity, but with concentrated support it will improve. Don't believe the numbers: in order to qualify as a legit number, that is, one of those who's taste opinions are extrapolated to conjure the audience numbers, you basically have to own a home, have a job, and be over the age of thirty five. They don't give out the diaries or boxes to students, unemployed, renters, young people. The numbers are derived from an aging population who have security. When this is considered, it is a small number polled, but it serves to target those who advertisers desire: those with disposable incomes who can buy what is advertised. By example, Da Vinci's Inquest, which delivered audiences around a million for several years before peaking, is now distributed in the u.s (another story of hard fought battles) is now seen by an average of anywhere from four to six million american viewers a week. The returning profits do not return to the producers, or writers, directors or actors: they go to Telefilm, which invested in the show in the first place and provided part of the production financing. So, things are structured so that even with us success, the benefits do not derive to the creators or work force. To build industry momentum, for development, and the hiring of talent, profits are essential. I now make a show called Intelligence, which has generated great audience reaction and critical raves. If others want the opportunity to make canadian shows in canada for international markets you must suit up for battle and make noise about it.
I'd watch Corner Gas if CTV didn't give away every single joke in its promos. I get sick of it before it's even on.
I would love it if the nails came back, but judging by the stench of privilege coming out of Gatineau this week, I'm not holding my breath.
Thing is, I really, really, really don't want to move to Los Angeles.
Well, we'll see. Thanks for making such a great show (Intelligence.) I suppose we'll all have to embrace that smuggler analogy sooner or later...
"Canadians don't want to watch Canadian shows."
This statement is true. Canadians want to watch shows that are entertaining. Traders and the other American ripoffs weren't as entertaining as the original thing. That's why no one watched.
Your statement is only partially right. The other side of the coin of shows like CORNER GAS not getting respect inside the industry for appealing to and reaching an audience, is the very real fact that many shows that deserve kudos and audience respect don't get it because they are not promoted and cannot compete.
A simplistic two sentence dismissal is no more the answer than running down the few successful shows.
Does everyone remember where Corner Gas premiered? Oppostite "Friends" on Thursday night. Then when it was a surprise success there they moved it a couple more times but to no avail, the audience kept finding it. Sure, CTV promotes the show now, but it sure seemed like they were trying to kill it at the beginning.
Thinking about it now, about half of the TV I've watched over my lifetime that were my favourites, were Canadian shows. Corner Gas of course included in that.
Fascinating. Living in the UK I'd never heard of Corner Gas, and a quick search of my usual DVD suppliers failed to find it. It reminds me very much of how the British movie industry used to be. We'd make a lot of high brow, critically acclaimed movies that no-one wanted to see! At last we seemed to have learned our lesson and are starting to make movies which actually make money!
I shall certainly keep a look out for Corner Gas in the future, it sounds too good to miss.
John Williams
London
UK
nail, meet the hammer's head. what fools are we to believe we could make an "important" show without considering the desires of the audience? negates the "importance" if the audience won't watch. maybe it's time the old boys holding the reins on all our funding rolled over and let their successors' ideas get something of value to the thirsty Canadian audiences. don't you think it's time we dropped the stigma we gained from those "quota-quickies?"
I live in the US. ,and i love Corner Gas although i have to obtain it illegally its well worth the effort.
Most American shows suck so i am always glad to find something worth watching ,even something "uniquely Canadian".
I'm English and I love Corner Gas. Why? It's funny, the characters are lovable and hilarious, the writing is sharp and well done and the actors and actresses appear to have been born for their roles. And the best part is, they don't script it to have a canned laugh every 20s, which seems to be the US' algorithm for comedy scripting.
I'm American and I love Corner Gas, and I'll even tell you why. The shows in the US "push the envelope" and are "outside of the box" so much that they completely lack believability. The reality of my life is that I'm surrounded by average people living average lives and yet we still manage to be important to each other, just like the folks on Corner Gas. People who act like they belong on a US show (sitcom or drama) are obnoxious. You want to tell them to shut up and sit down. Granted, you'd want to say that to Hank sometimes, but it'd be because he's legitimately an idiot and not trying to be one. I hope WGN keeps airing the series for us down here!
That was a GREAT article. I am an American and I love Trailer Park Boys and can't understand why Canada isn't trying to market the show more. Every person I know who has seen in the US loved it. If HBO or FX picked it up, it would be a cult favorite. Also I want to see "Corner Gas", is their anyway that I could see it online or in the US. Thanks.
Matt, if you have access to the WGN Superstation on your cable dial, Corner Gas runs Sunday to Thursday at midnight.
If you don't have the WGN Superstation, I'd suggest finding someone who does and getting em to tape it for you.
But the show does run in the USA.
It's also on DVD in Canada. Not sure about the USA, but maybe you could get it via Netflix or at a large video store?
A bit late to the conversation here, but let me chime in as another American who became a Corner Gas fan.
I recently relocated to Alberta from the States, and was introduced to Corner Gas through several nights of insomnia. While the humor isn't roll-out-of-chair funny (though some gags have made me laugh out loud), the charm of the show is nearly tangible.
And now having been in Canada for a bit, I can see its local, national and cross-border appeal. I think you're spot-on in the assessment that it has been using the best of both worlds (successful production methods with its distinct local flair).
It's a shame the series will be coming to a close after this season, but like most good things that come to an end, it's exiting while out on top -- and hope it has become a model for new Canadian programs in development.
Re: Can't Stop The Trouble: Gassin' Up For the Weekend
Well, let me just respond to the spineless creep who secured an anonymous hotmail account just so s/he/it could try to wreck your weekend with that threatening email to shut your mouth.
I for one am damn proud that a working writer like you, Denis, has the perspicacity, the guts and the talent to expose the shortcomings of our industry, not for personal gain or petty politics, but because of a genuine desire to make it better.
So thank you. Keep talking. I and many others are listening attentively.
As an American I totally get what you are saying and agree 100 percent! Having been born and raised in South Central Virginia, basically a very rural farming community, I can really relate to Corner Gas AND Trailer Park Boys. But it's more than that. The writing and acting on both those shows are just so damn spot on that I think you NEED a brain to really get everything that's happening. Makes me wanna pack my shit and move to the great white North!
My wife and I watch the show in Phoenix, Arizona, courtesy of WGN Chicago on cable.
We both love the show. When other people come over and I try to tell them about the show I can't explain why we like it. It ends up sounding like I'm telling them not to watch it when I desribe it. I say things like, "It's a gas station and a cafe in the middle of nowhere. There are about a dozen people in the show, and not much ever really happens there."
Then we make them watch the show and they love it too.
I don't understand it, but that's ok.
Dean and Bonnie.
USA
I believe people who criticize Corner Gas for being poorly written and produced are completely mistaken (or biased because of jealousy). If its genre is accepted as a given, then a fair evaluation must be that Corner Gas is an exceptionally good TV show. Its writing is inventive and tight, its multiple-camera shooting is more sophisticated than most sitcoms, and its acting performances are fantastic. Along with its high-quality production, the show is sweet and enjoyable, which makes it popular.
Perhaps some people pooh-pooh Corner Gas because it is popular with (gasp!) normal people. "If the great unwashed enjoy it, it must be for simpletons." What an unfortunate set of beliefs that would be!
We've recently discovered Corner Gas on WGN Chicago and are addicted - but then we love Red Green too. The ensemble cast has a subtlety and timing usually associated with the better Britcoms. I'm surprised to read that Canadians prefer the crap that comes up from south of the border when clearly they have plenty of talent at home. You'd watch According to Jim over Corner Gas? Too many slap shots to the head by the sound of that.
I'm a huge Corner Gas fan here in the states - after stumbling upon it on WGN America one late night.
Unfortunately, WGN appears not to be interested in airing the final season, so I've gotten the show "other ways". It appears that CTV has made a recent decision to allow streaming CG from its website outside of Canada, which is great.
Now, I know I'm a "Canadaphile" and even have a CBC Radio widget on my desktop (!), but whether the snobs admit to it or not...CG is a well-produced, well-written, well-crafted show. Brent Butt is a funny writer and comedian, the entire cast is talented as heck, and the show is on a par production-value wise with any show down here.
With no offense to the late Don Adams, CG is no clone of "Check It Out!", which we Americans got on cable a long time ago.
And anyone who would rather watch "According to Jim"...the mere thought makes me shudder.
You can like or not like Corner Gas. But it is not the same kind of sitcom claptrap we produce here in the States, and that your networks (such as CTV and Global) ship back to you in a closed feed.
Mike Ward
Akron, OH
Post a Comment